Huarp vs Puppeteer

Understand the key differences between managing your own infrastructure and using Huarp.

The General Verdict

Use Puppeteer if: You are an experienced Node.js developer, have servers with plenty of spare RAM, love configuring Dockerfiles, and don't mind manually maintaining proxies and captchas.

Use Huarp if: You want to drag and drop nodes in n8n, focus on business logic, need ready-to-use infrastructure, and want to scale without worrying about infrastructure.

Feature Puppeteer (Self-Hosted) Huarp (Managed)
Initial Cost Free (Open Source) Paid (with Free plan)
Maintenance Cost Very High (DevOps) Zero
n8n Integration Via Code Node (Complex) Native Node or HTTP
RAM Consumption ~1GB per tab Zero on your server
Human Simulation Requires complex coding Automatic

The invisible cost of Puppeteer

Many start with Puppeteer because it's "free". But when you calculate the engineering team's time to fix bugs, update Chrome versions that break compatibility, and manage beefy servers, the real cost is much higher than a monthly subscription.

Huarp's Philosophy

Huarp doesn't want to replace Puppeteer (we use it internally!). We want to replace your headache of managing it. We package best practices into a simple API.

Test Huarp in practice

Compare it yourself. Create an automation in 5 minutes.

Create Free Account